Direct Commerce
Search all articles

 
Search term required

Logicalware

Contact Pacnet today



Quick links

Subscription: Latest issue | Subscribe
News: Latest news
Tactics: Categories
Views: Categories
Expert Roster: Suppliers | List brokers
Contact us: Editorial | Advertising

Most recent articles
articles

 

 

Linked in

Twitter

Join CatEx DCA today

The way the cookie crumbles


By Miri Thomas | Publication date: 11/05/2012 | Category: News

 

On 26th May, new laws come into force governing the way websites use cookies to track user behaviour. The new EU ePrivacy Directive, dubbed the cookie law, was adopted last May by the UK government with website owners given a year’s grace to become compliant.

With the aim of protecting the privacy of internet users, the Directive requires websites to obtain permission from users before certain types of cookies—small files that store information about an individual’s online session—are used. Companies that do not comply could face fines of up to £500,000.

“The cookie laws have created a confusing situation for all website owners. There are pages and pages trying to interpret what needs to be done to be compliant—and as yet no clear answer,” says Chloe Thomas, who runs online marketing agency IndiumOnline. “The key point of the UK version is that you need ‘prior consent’ in order to drop ‘nonessential’ cookies on users. Prior consent is easy to understand, but hard to implement,” she adds.

Essential cookies are defined as those necessary for a service, for example, to remember the contents of a user’s basket as he navigates an online shop, and are therefore exempt. “The offending cookies are those that study the customer’s profile and behaviour, are applied to personalise a website or serve relevant third-party adverts,” explains Kevin Galway of digital marketing agency BSS Digital. In order to continue using nonessential cookies, website owners must unambiguously obtain consent from users; for example, by updating privacy policies or using pop-ups during a visitor’s session. Even businesses that don’t use sophisticated behavourial targeting tools need to comply, as Galway warns, “if your site uses Google Analytics, then you are impacted by this law.”

Taking the biscuit

Some retailers welcome the “fuzzy nature” of the new regulations. Rob Silsbury, ecommerce director UK and Europe at Tiffany & Co, says that while complying fully with the new regulation, “we are looking at the lack of defined boundaries as a positive, giving us some freedom to ensure that the impact on our business and the customer experience is minimal”. For him, the big question is what constitutes “consent” and how to deal with those who don’t give it. “The issue of whether ‘consent’ needs to involve a click is the biggest focus and we will be preparing a couple of approaches based on two very different views of the answer.”  

At another business that spoke to Direct Commerce on condition of anonymity, the year’s grace helped focus the ecommerce team. Its head of multichannel retail says, “We have run internal audits to understand the totality of the cookies we collect, we considered how best to address the requirement of informed consent, and in particular we paid careful attention to what the ICO was saying and what some of the larger brands were doing.”

For the main part, he is taking a wait-and-see approach, “We noted that the ICO was really only going to act in cases of widespread complaint, or where cookies were being collected for nefarious purposes. As we are unlikely to trigger either of those elements, we will not be actively asking for informed consent.” This isn’t a complete flouting of the law, he hastened to add, “we recognise we could do more to explain to customers about the information we gather on them, and we will be progressively updating our privacy policies over the next three to six months to be more open”.

An ecommerce manager at a leading fashion brand told Direct Commerce he had no plans to implement an “opt-in pop-up, roll-down or otherwise”. But what he has done is make the site’s cookie policy robust, listing exactly what cookies it uses and how. His plan, he says, is to wait for as long as possible before having to implement drastic changes. He will make his move “once the cookie question becomes nonthreatening”—the same strategy he used when complying with 3D Secure, he adds.

“It’s tempting to see this as another PCI DSS or 3D Secure. But it’s worse,” says Chloe Thomas. “At least with them it was black and white what needed to be done to be compliant. The penalties for not being compliant with the cookie law are big, but the ICO doesn’t have the resources to prosecute lots of companies.”
So what should you do to ensure you meet the deadline? In the first instance, says BSS’s Galway, all retailers should read the ICO’s guidelines. “Then find out what type of cookies your site has and determine the optimum solution to obtain consent from visitors. There will be a fine balance between the desire to collect as much information as possible on visitors and not deterring them away from your site, but retailers must address this challenge now before it’s too late.”

 

 

Back


Post comment

Have your say

Your name: A value is required.
Comment title:
Title is required.
Comment:
   
 
Sign in to post a comment: Sign in > New user >

*Mandatory fields your email address will not be published. All comments are moderated and may be edited. Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Catalogue Development Centre Ltd.



Read all comments
Total comments posted: 2

Trust and privacy are paramount
By Mark Haviland | Publication date: 25/05/2012 09:48:09 |

While the EU Cookie Directive has given a few online businesses and marketers headaches over the past year, ultimately the conversation about privacy has been productive. Trust and privacy are paramount and we should all be actively promoting open dialogue and transparent business models.

Shoppers are becoming increasingly discerning online, and the debate has encouraged brands, agencies and other online businesses to assess the quality of marketing they serve to audiences, and the respect they show for privacy. It’s a call to action to turn data insights into a better online experience, so that consumers want to opt-in, be it implicit or explicit. As an industry, if we want to deliver the tailored and personalised experiences that shoppers increasingly expect, the proper use of data is essential.

We need to continue to collaborate as an industry to educate internet users on how cookie information is used and highlight the value of opting in. The consumer-oriented web site, Performance Marketing Explained, developed by the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) is a fantastic step forward, but it doesn’t stop there, we must all ensure we continue to prove the value of this more open retail relationship to consumers and legislators alike.”

Mark Haviland, MD at Rakuten LinkShare


Response from eCommera
By Michael Ross | Publication date: 11/05/2012 11:39:07 |

The EU Cookie law is simply a bad law and a restraint to trade online at a time when business needs all the help it can get.

Trading online without using cookies for analytics or various types of marketing tracking is analogous to asking a retailer to trade blindfolded. It's simply not possible.

The law is well intentioned - protecting consumers and consumer data is important but one needs to police the abuse, not the benign actions of honest online merchants.

Michael Ross, Director of eCommera.